SB661
Senate · 2026 sessionRepublicanVeto — override pendingOversight of pooled risk management programs
AI-generatedEnables the secretary of state to require abatement or seek receivership of a pooled risk management program, requires pro rata assessment of members to cover deficiencies, and sets standards of care and contingency reserves.
relative to pooled risk management programs.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
5 submissionsThe one written submission was individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Vetoed by the governor — the override vote has not been held yet · June 24, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓Senate
- ✓House
- Governor
- Law
Argument analysis · complete record
AI-generatedall 1 hand-written submissions read in fullOnly one written submission was received on SB661, and it expresses support. The submitter praises the bill's drafting and the safeguards it establishes, though the text also references passing "SB88."
- Bill is well drafted by its sponsorsSupport1 of 1 · 100%
The submitter credits the sponsoring senators with putting the bill together well.
- Safeguards are importantSupport1 of 1 · 100%
The submitter states that the safeguards contained in the bill are important to have and urges passage.
Percentages are of the 1 individually-written submissions, every one of which was read in full — not a sample. A submission making several arguments is counted under each.
Form-letter detection only groups a template once at least ten people send it, so smaller sets of submissions sharing near-identical wording are counted here as individual testimony. On bills where a handful of writers worked from the same talking points, a count may therefore run slightly ahead of the number of independently-written arguments.
Generated by anthropic/claude-opus-5 on Aug 10, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Argument groupings are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
The record · every submission as filed
5 submissions| Expand | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Germano Martins for Myself Hooksett This bill is well put together, I believe Senator Carson and Senator Gray did well putting this together. It is important to have these safeguards. It is important to pass SB88. We should pass it. | Hooksett | Support | 206 | Apr 14, 2026 | ||
Brian Ryll for PFFNH Concord Position recorded without written comment. | Concord | Support | — | — | Apr 14, 2026 | |
Deaglan McEachern for The City of Portmsouth Portsmouth Position recorded without written comment. | Portsmouth | Oppose | — | — | Apr 14, 2026 | |
Michelle Flynn for Myself Portsmouth Position recorded without written comment. | Portsmouth | Oppose | — | — | Apr 14, 2026 | |
Senator James Gray for Myself Rochester - District 6 Position recorded without written comment. | Rochester - District 6 | Support | — | — | Apr 14, 2026 |