Citizen in a RepublicNH House Testimony

SB572

Senate · 2026 sessionDemocraticKilled in House

Selling the Anna Philbrook Center property

AI-generated

Exempts the sale of the state-owned Anna Philbrook Center for Children property in Concord from standard hospital real estate sale requirements and directs its sale, offered first to the city and county.

relative to New Hampshire hospital real estate.Official record

State GovernmentProperty - Real and PersonalChildrenAI-generated

Division of testimonyComputed by this site

379 submissions

Hatched = form letter ··

Status

Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · May 7, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. Senate
  3. House
  4. Governor
  5. Law
Sponsors, hearings & roll-call votes

Argument digest

AI-generatedfrom 184 of 194 written submissions

SB572 is nominally a bill about New Hampshire hospital real estate, but nearly all testimony addresses a non-germane amendment that would revive HB1616 (tabled last session), barring state and local government agencies from using public funds to advertise or promote vaccines. Testimony is overwhelmingly opposed to this amendment, including from several submissions tagged 'support' that clarify they support the underlying real-estate bill but oppose the added vaccine-advertising restriction; no submission was found substantively defending the restriction itself. Opponents argue the amendment is an improper legislative maneuver, would silence important public health communication, risk federal funding, and reflects anti-science political influence rather than sound health policy.

Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.

Form-letter campaigns

11 of 194 written submissions (6%)

11 submissions match a shared template; 183 are individually written.

  • Opposition to HB 1616 AmendmentAI-generatedOppose11 submissions on this bill

    The template argues against an amendment that would prohibit public funding for vaccine promotion, characterizing it as an anti-vaccine measure.

    The letter · submitted 11 times

    I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB 1616. This is a replace-all amendment to bring back HB 1616, which was tabled last session. HB 1616 is an anti-vaccine bill that would prohibit “any state agency or political subdivision from using public funds to advertise or otherwise promote vaccines."

Detected by text-similarity clustering — that part is arithmetic. The name describing each template is written by a model.

The record · every submission as filed

379 submissions
Expand
Noel Cartwright
for Myself
Litchfield

I strongly oppose the non-germaine amendment which is the text of HB1616.

Oppose
Faith Northrop
for Myself
Durham

I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB1616.

Oppose
Sophia Sherburn
for Myself
Franconia

I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is in the text of HB1616.

Oppose
Tommy Christen
for Myself
Lyme

: By prohibiting state agencies and local governments from advertising vaccines or spending any money on vaccine advertising, SB572 would limit families knowledge about access to vaccines. This silences the state's ability to communicate with families about vaccine-preventable diseases during outbreaks or to provide educational resources to health care providers. This bill could also jeopardize up to $3.5 million in federal immunization funding if the state cannot meet federal requirements for public education and communication. Families deserve to have up-to-date health information and should know when their children face health risks or accessible healthcare is available in their community.

Oppose
Barbara Callaway
for Myself
Hanover

"I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB 1616." This is a replace-all amendment to bring back HB 1616, which was tabled last session. HB 1616 is an anti-vaccine bill that would prohibit “any state agency or political subdivision from using public funds to advertise or otherwise promote vaccines.”

OpposeForm letter
Nancy Brooks
for Myself
West Chesterfield

I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB 1616.

Oppose
Judith Carnes
for Myself
Hinsdale

I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB 1616

Oppose
Rev. Dr. Gail Kinney
for Myself
Canaan

This non-germane amendment has NO business in this bill. Further, it promotes what would be a public health travesty. This language deserves quick removal from this legislation!

Oppose
Lori Raymond
for Myself
Loudon

Testimony is for non-germane amendment. I am a member of the public who believes it is very important to have our vaccinations for children, adults and the elderly. It protects our public health for all. Please oppose HB 572. Thank you

Oppose
Letitia Ufford
for Myself
HANOVER

"I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB 1616." This is a replace-all amendment to bring back HB 1616, which was tabled last session. HB 1616 is an anti-vaccine bill that would prohibit “any state agency or political subdivision from using public funds to advertise or otherwise promote vaccines.”

OpposeForm letter
Rhonda Capasso Tralli
for Myself
Keene

I OPPOSE the Anti-Vaccine Amendment based on humanitarian interests.

Oppose
Susan Tteleaven
for Myself
Dover

I oppose the non-germane amendment to this bill.

Support
meredith morgan
for Myself
hanover

I oppose replacing HB572 with HB1616. Changing the current bill with another that had been tabled/rejected is not the intent of HB572.. I support information and recommendations for childhood vaccines and adult vacci.nes

Oppose
Karen Chase
for Myself
Hanover

I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB 1616. This is a replace-all amendment to bring back HB 1616, which was tabled last session. HB 1616 is an anti-vaccine bill that would prohibit “any state agency or political subdivision from using public funds to advertise or otherwise promote vaccines.

OpposeForm letter
Linda Snorek
for Myself
Spofford

I oppose this non-germane amendment. It is the text of HB1616.

Oppose
margaret barker
for Myself
littleton

Vaccine education is crucial to New Hampshire. I have family in the state who are considered immunocompromised, so the risk of them becoming sick when vaccines could have been used as prevention is not one I am willing to take.

Oppose
Ann Carlson
for Myself
Keene

I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB 1616. This bill would silence the state's ability to communicate with families about vaccine options and eliminate essential educational resources for public health.

Oppose
Christine Ojendyk
for Myself
Hopkinton

As a finance professional and a parent, I know that vaccines are both cost effective and save lives by mitigating the health risks associated with preventable diseases. The widespread use of the Polio vaccine proved this over seventy years ago. I support free speech and educating health care providers and New Hampshire families on vaccines. Also, I’m concerned that up to $3.5 million in federal immunization funding might be jeopardized if the state cannot meet the federal requirements for public education and communication. Therefore I oppose this SB 572.

Oppose
Kenneth Dolkart
for Myself
Grantham

Using subterfuge to actively undermine children's protection from serious disease would be the plot of evil-doers in a way-out fictional novel! Vaccines and medical science have created a US world of child protection from infectious disease in which vaccine deniers can safely synthesize their cock-eyed theories. That is not fiction. Vaccines causing autism IS fiction. It is mind-bending that radicalized conspiracy collectors, trolls and personal haters of the elites of established science would apply their fevered political conviction to halt the promotion of the vaccines which have protected all of us for 70 years. Please restore sanity to our Statehouse.

Oppose
Pamela DiNapoli
for Myself
Manchester

I am writing in opposition to the addition of the Non Germane amendment that includes the language from HB 1616 which was tabled by the House. I encourage you to take the same action and table this harmful amendment

Oppose
Jeffrey Jones
for Myself
Lisbon

I oppose the non-germane amendment preventing doctors and other health care professionals from providing patients with relevant information regarding vaccines. Vaccines have been successful and critical in controlling diseases and preventing suffering. Please oppose SB527 with the HB1616 amendment.

Oppose
Steven Sebastian
for Myself
West Chesterfield

I strongly oppose the non-germane amendment which has been added to HB 1616. Our state health department and local communities should not be prevented from communicating with families during an outbreak or informing families when vaccines are available . I am also opposed to the amendment's provision to eliminate educational resources for health care providers. New Hampshire and our public health system deserve better than this irresponsible bill

Oppose
Karen Sebastian
for Myself
West Chesterfield

I strongly oppose the non-germane amendment tacked onto HB 1616. This is yet another harmful, repressive, and irresponsible anti public health bill. Our state health department and local communities should not be prevented from informing families when vaccines are available or communicating with them during an outbreak. I am also opposed to the amendment's provision to eliminate educational resources for health care providers. New Hampshire deserves better.

Oppose
ED FRIEDRICH
for Myself
Loudon

I oppose the non-germane amendment, which is the text of HB 1616.

Oppose
Audrey Holst
for Myself
Nashua

Easy access to information about keeping families safe is essential! There's a reason NH families have been so healthy historically - they know how to protect their children because they've been taught how. Don't threaten the future health of NH.

Oppose