SB542
Senate · 2026 sessionRepublicanInterim studyLimiting charity gaming dates
AI-generatedLimits the number of game dates available to charitable organizations at gaming facilities.
(New Title) limiting the game dates available to charities at gaming facilities.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
7 submissionsAll 3 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Referred to interim study (House) · April 9, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓Senate
- House
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
7 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hannah Meiselman for Myself Manchester I oppose SB 542 because reducing available gaming dates harms small nonprofits that rely on these events for fundraising. This bill restricts charitable revenue without providing a clear public benefit. | Manchester | Oppose | 202 | Mar 9, 2026 | |
Daniel Richardson for Myself Nashua This bill guarantees a much larger cut of sin-profits to the syndicate and slashes charitable gaming days. | Nashua | Oppose | 106 | Mar 9, 2026 | |
CORY STONE for Myself Dover Overcomplicating an operation that will drive more money to charities where we have limited financial oversight. | Dover | Oppose | 112 | Mar 9, 2026 | |
Scott Burns for Myself Franklin Position recorded without written comment. | Franklin | Oppose | — | Mar 23, 2026 | |
Daniel Richardson for Myself Nashua Position recorded without written comment. | Nashua | Support | — | Mar 23, 2026 | |
Claudia Ferber for Myself Gilmanton Position recorded without written comment. | Gilmanton | Oppose | — | Mar 9, 2026 | |
Senator Howard Pearl for Senate District 17 Loudon Position recorded without written comment. | Loudon | Support | — | Mar 9, 2026 |