SB298
Senate · 2026 sessionRepublicanDied in SenateAgency review standards and scent ban
AI-generatedDirects courts to resolve doubt in favor of interpretations that limit agency power in actions involving state agencies, prohibits scented products in public areas of state buildings, and establishes a committee to study certification and operational standards for recovery residences.
(New Title) relative to the scope of review of state agency interpretations, prohibiting the use of scented products in public areas of state buildings, and establishing a committee to study the implementation and effectiveness of the mandatory statewide certification process and operational standards for recovery residences.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
80 submissionsAll 6 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Died — the House and Senate did not agree · May 21, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓Senate
- ✓House
- ✕Senate
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
80 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deborah Klein Walker for Myself Meredith As a former state director of services for addiction, I support this bill. It will make it easier to assure the quality of services in NH. | Meredith | Support | 139 | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Ben Dibble for Myself Hudson This is a good bill. It will protect residents and communities by ensuring that all recovery houses meet established health and safety standards. This would strengthen New Hampshire’s recovery housing system. | Hudson | Support | 208 | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Cheryle Pacapelli for Myself Salisbury To: House Executive Departments and Administration Committee Re: Support for SB 298-FN – Recovery Residence Certification Date: March 2026 Dear Chairman and Members of the House Executive Departments and Administration Committee, I am writing to express my support for SB 298-FN, which establishes a statewide requirement that recovery residences in New Hampshire obtain certification. New Hampshire has already taken an important step toward ensuring quality recovery housing through the designation of New Hampshire Peer Recovery Residences (NHPRR) as the state’s certifying body for recovery residences. NHPRR provides an established certification framework with standards that align with nationally recognized best practices supported by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Through this existing system, more than 90 recovery residences across New Hampshire have already been certified, demonstrating that providers throughout the state are willing and able to meet high standards that promote safe, ethical, and recovery-oriented housing environments. SB 298 builds on this existing infrastructure rather than creating a new system. By requiring certification through the established NHPRR process, the state can ensure that all recovery housing operates with consistent expectations for resident safety, ethical management, and recovery-supportive practices. Importantly, SB 298 also creates a level playing field across the recovery housing landscape. Today, responsible operators are already meeting rigorous standards, while others may operate without the same accountability. Requiring certification ensures that all providers are held to the same expectations, supporting ethical operators and preventing unfair advantages for those who do not follow best practices. In addition, this legislation is a critical consumer protection measure. Individuals seeking recovery—and their families—deserve confidence that recovery residences are safe, well-managed, and truly supportive of long-term recovery. A statewide certification requirement helps protect residents from unsafe or exploitative environments and provides transparency for referral sources, communities, and stakeholders. Recovery residences play a critical role in helping individuals sustain recovery, rebuild stability, and reconnect with employment, family, and community. Ensuring that these homes operate under clear, evidence-informed standards benefits residents, families, treatment providers, municipalities, and the broader public. SB 298 represents a practical and thoughtful step forward because it recognizes that the framework already exists in New Hampshire and ensures that all recovery residences meet the same standards of quality, accountability, and integrity. I respectfully urge the Committee to support SB 298-FN. Thank you for your consideration and for your continued commitment to strengthening recovery supports across our state. Sincerely, Cheryle Pacapelli Woman in long term recovery since 1989 and former recovery house owner for 21 years | Salisbury | Support | 3,095 | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Suellen Peluso for Myself Hopkinton Thank you for your work and representation. Please vote YES on this critically important bill. | Hopkinton | Support | 95 | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Michele Holt-Shannon for Myself Dover This bill has broad support and I am hoping you will vote to support it as well. Thank you! | Dover | Support | 91 | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Cynthia Rodenhauser Stewart for Myself MANCHESTER We do not ever want another Eric Spofford nightmare in the State again! https://www.13thsteppodcast.org/ | MANCHESTER | Support | 107 | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Brian Kiely for Myself Portsmouth Position recorded without written comment. | Portsmouth | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Marie Kiely for Myself Portsmouth Position recorded without written comment. | Portsmouth | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Patricia Anastasia for Myself Londonderry Position recorded without written comment. | Londonderry | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
John DeJoie for National Association of Social Workers-NH Chapter Concord Position recorded without written comment. | Concord | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Christine Ojendyk for Myself Hopkinton Position recorded without written comment. | Hopkinton | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Daniel Richardson for Myself Nashua Position recorded without written comment. | Nashua | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Stephanie Latini for Myself Peterborough Position recorded without written comment. | Peterborough | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Gary Hamer for Myself MANCHESTER Position recorded without written comment. | MANCHESTER | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Heidi Hamer for Myself MANCHESTER Position recorded without written comment. | MANCHESTER | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Jennifer Bliss for Myself Peterborough Position recorded without written comment. | Peterborough | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Lindy Keller for Myself Concord Position recorded without written comment. | Concord | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Laureen Hart for Myself Belmont Position recorded without written comment. | Belmont | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Savitri Horrigan for Myself Manchester Position recorded without written comment. | Manchester | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Paula Marston for Myself Epping Position recorded without written comment. | Epping | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Peter Mason for Myself Lebanon Position recorded without written comment. | Lebanon | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Ingrid Markman for Myself Hollis Position recorded without written comment. | Hollis | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Richard Benton for Myself Center Sandwich Position recorded without written comment. | Center Sandwich | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Tracy Brunner for Myself Concord Position recorded without written comment. | Concord | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 | |
Susan Smith for Myself Dover Position recorded without written comment. | Dover | Support | — | Mar 25, 2026 |