HB1725
House · 2026 sessionDemocraticKilled in HouseRegulating artificial intelligence
AI-generatedEstablishes a new statutory chapter regulating the development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence technologies in New Hampshire.
relative to the regulation of artificial intelligence technologies.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
7 submissionsAll 2 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 19, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
7 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
georgina Lambert for Myself Belmont Testimony on HB 1725: Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Technologies I stand before you to express my concerns regarding the underpinnings of HB 1725, particularly its lack of funding and oversight mechanisms. While the bill aims to create a framework for the development and use of artificial intelligence technologies in New Hampshire, it does so without the necessary financial resources to support its objectives. The Department of Justice's projected budget increases of approximately $235,000 annually highlight the urgent need for dedicated funding. However, since the bill does not authorize additional positions or allocations, this poses a significant risk to effective implementation and enforcement. Furthermore, the bill's administrative oversight primarily relies on a newly established Artificial Intelligence Council, yet there is ambiguity surrounding its authority and capabilities. The limited expertise among its members, who must be appointed by various political figures, raises concerns about whether decisions made will reflect the diverse and inclusive intersectional perspectives required to address potential biases that AI systems may perpetuate. The council's influence over ethical AI development could be significantly enhanced through transparent processes and community representation to ensure that the voices of impacted populations are heard. In conclusion, while HB 1725 is an important step towards responsible AI governance, it is imperative to recognize the need for robust oversight and adequate funding. A truly transformative regulatory framework must support the necessary infrastructures to hold AI technologies accountable and ensure they serve the public interest without reinforcing existing inequalities. How do we plan to safeguard the welfare of our diverse communities without the requisite financial and human resources? It is essential to prioritize these considerations as discussions around this bill progress. | Belmont | Oppose | 1,977 | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Michaela Janowski for Myself Epping Artificial intelligence poses many risks that must be studied and prevented BEFORE this technology is integrated into every day life to irrevocable levels. | Epping | Support | 155 | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Sarah Scott for Americans for Prosperity New Hampshire Somersworth Position recorded without written comment. | Somersworth | Oppose | — | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Heather Raymond for Myself Nashua Position recorded without written comment. | Nashua | Support | — | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Kathleen Neilan for Myself Lebanon Position recorded without written comment. | Lebanon | Support | — | Jan 15, 2026 | |
David McGarry for Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) N/A Position recorded without written comment. | N/A, DC | Support | — | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Katie McLaughlin for Myself Weare Position recorded without written comment. | Weare | Support | — | Jan 15, 2026 |