Citizen in a RepublicNH House Testimony

HB1725

House · 2026 sessionDemocraticKilled in House

Regulating artificial intelligence

AI-generated

Establishes a new statutory chapter regulating the development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence technologies in New Hampshire.

relative to the regulation of artificial intelligence technologies.Official record

State GovernmentBusiness and IndustryAI-generated

Division of testimonyComputed by this site

7 submissions
Neutral 0

All 2 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.

Status

Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 19, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law
Sponsors, hearings & roll-call votes

The record · every submission as filed

7 submissions
Expand
georgina Lambert
for Myself
Belmont

Testimony on HB 1725: Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Technologies I stand before you to express my concerns regarding the underpinnings of HB 1725, particularly its lack of funding and oversight mechanisms. While the bill aims to create a framework for the development and use of artificial intelligence technologies in New Hampshire, it does so without the necessary financial resources to support its objectives. The Department of Justice's projected budget increases of approximately $235,000 annually highlight the urgent need for dedicated funding. However, since the bill does not authorize additional positions or allocations, this poses a significant risk to effective implementation and enforcement. Furthermore, the bill's administrative oversight primarily relies on a newly established Artificial Intelligence Council, yet there is ambiguity surrounding its authority and capabilities. The limited expertise among its members, who must be appointed by various political figures, raises concerns about whether decisions made will reflect the diverse and inclusive intersectional perspectives required to address potential biases that AI systems may perpetuate. The council's influence over ethical AI development could be significantly enhanced through transparent processes and community representation to ensure that the voices of impacted populations are heard. In conclusion, while HB 1725 is an important step towards responsible AI governance, it is imperative to recognize the need for robust oversight and adequate funding. A truly transformative regulatory framework must support the necessary infrastructures to hold AI technologies accountable and ensure they serve the public interest without reinforcing existing inequalities. How do we plan to safeguard the welfare of our diverse communities without the requisite financial and human resources? It is essential to prioritize these considerations as discussions around this bill progress.

Oppose
Michaela Janowski
for Myself
Epping

Artificial intelligence poses many risks that must be studied and prevented BEFORE this technology is integrated into every day life to irrevocable levels.

Support
Sarah Scott
for Americans for Prosperity New Hampshire
Somersworth

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Heather Raymond
for Myself
Nashua

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Kathleen Neilan
for Myself
Lebanon

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
David McGarry
for Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA)
N/A

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Katie McLaughlin
for Myself
Weare

Position recorded without written comment.

Support