HB1702

Absolutely not. This state lives free or dies. How dare anyone considers this a win for NH.

I oppose the idea of the proposed requirements for institutions that dispense abortion medications. My understanding of the information suggested to be posted is that it is of dubious accuracy or medical value. Furthermore this would seem to violate those facilities' first amendment rights to not have compelled speech forced upon them by the government. Forcing individuals into contact with anti-abortion rhetoric inserts the government into the decision making process between patients and doctors, where they have no business being.

Keep your nose out of a woman's right to choose, a decision that is between her and her doctor.

Keep identity politics out of health care. Our medical practitioners who provide up to date science backed care should not be criminally prosecuted for doing their jobs correctly. People will be harmed and possibly die if this bill is passed

The decision to pursue any medical treatments should be between a patient and their doctor, NEVER the government.

I ask that you please OPPOSE this bill.

please *oppose

I ask that you please *oppose* this bill. I want everyone in my state to have access to accurate information regarding their health, and I want medical professionals to be able to do their jobs in peace. For those whose party affiliation stands for less government interference, I hope that you act in accordance with that and **oppose* this bill. Thank you.

Full and complete medical informed consent already covers this and it is poor to single out medications or procedures believing that they are somehow not already subject to the existing ethical and legal codes.

This is another way to force women to have unwanted pregnancies. No!

Please do not pass this bill. This is a woman’s choice and the government should not be involved in women’s choices.

This is a violation of our personal freedoms at the most fundamental level. Politicians should not be interfering with personal medical decisions.

abortions are part of health care options for women and a civil right. Denying women access to abortions is equivalent to death in some cases. We cannot find Women's health providers in the state if we are denying those providers the right to decode what is best for their patient.

I strongly oppose this bill. The government needs to stop exercising control over women’s bodies. Pregnancy and how to deal with it is a personal decision not to be made by some man in government.

Are you piss flaps out of your minds

This is a direct infringement on a woman’s right to choose. Our bodies dont need to be legislated and providers/pharmacists are not villains.

FFS

This is 2026. The world has moved on from the dark ages

I oppose this bill deeply. Abortion is the only medical procedure we vote on. It is ridiculous. A doctor and pharmacist are just doing their jobs also. Since when did my doctor have to agree with me on everything in order to complete my care? This bill is harmful and inhumane.

Testimony in Opposition to HB 1702 (2026) – Relative to notice requirements for pharmacies dispensing chemical abortion drugs As a New Hampshire resident, I respectfully urge the committee to oppose HB 1702. This bill mandates that medical facilities and pharmacies post a state-scripted sign claiming that medication abortion using mifepristone “may be possible to reverse” and directs patients to a specific hotline organization. This is government-compelled speech in a clinical setting, substituting politics for individualized medical counseling. Major medical experts have stated that so-called “medication abortion reversal” is not supported by scientific evidence and does not meet clinical standards; patients deserve accurate, evidence-based information not messaging the state requires providers to display. ? HB 1702 also imposes extreme penalties, including making “knowing” violations a class B felony, and creates broad civil liability for alleged injuries. These provisions will predictably chill pharmacists and providers, increase legal risk and costs, and reduce access to time-sensitive, FDA-regulated care; especially in communities with fewer providers. New Hampshire should support informed consent by ensuring patients receive counseling grounded in accepted medical evidence, not by requiring signage that elevates disputed claims and threatens clinicians and pharmacies with felony prosecution. For these reasons, I ask you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL) on HB 1702.

We should be giving people more rights with regards to reproductive Healthcare not threatening providers with felony charges

Poor people need to have good and sufficient food.

Oppose

Government should not dictate who gets medical care, including reproductive care. The only people who should be involved are the patient and their provider.

This is a violation of our rights as citizens. Stay out oof women's health choices.