Citizen in a RepublicNH House Testimony

HB1553

House · 2026 sessionDemocraticKilled in House

Limits on pet fees and rent

AI-generated

Limits monthly pet rent to one percent of a rental unit's rent and prohibits nonrefundable pet fees, with certain exceptions.

relative to pet-related fees and rent in residential tenancies.Official record

Property - Real and PersonalBusiness and IndustryAI-generated

Division of testimonyComputed by this site

52 submissions
Neutral 0

All 10 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.

Status

Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 19, 2026
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law
Sponsors, hearings & roll-call votes

The record · every submission as filed

52 submissions
Expand
Lauren Martin
for Myself
Amherst

Pet rent is an additional expense to owning a pet that has become extremely expensive. I have one cat, ONE. And I have to pay $55 a month to have him in my apartment. This is in addition to the $250 non-refundable pet deposit I paid upon moving in. I hope we can pass this bill to cap the rising cost of pet rent.

Support
Jacqueline Calhoun
for Myself
Plymouth

Please keep this in mind, as you consider HB 1553. I am confident this Bill is a good one and will benefit our pet-friendly housing community: "Being unable to find affordable, pet-friendly housing is one of the top reasons people surrender pets to shelters or offer them to strangers on Craigslist and similar platforms. Either way, this consequence can be devastating to the pet in question, whether given to a stranger (who could be a violent criminal) or surrendered to a shelter, where they could be killed." Please SUPPORT HB 1553. Thank you!

Support
Linda Rauter
for Myself
Chichester

There is a serious shortage of affordable housing. Tacking on ridiculously high pet fees onto the rent leads to pet surrenders to shelters which are already stressed to care for pets surrendered because of rising costs of living.. Caps on fees or a 1% fee based on the rent may help people keep their beloved pets.

Support
Anita Fernandez
for Myself
Manchester

As someone who rented property with a companion animal and paid a monthly fee, I understand that animal companions cost money and that the monthly charge helps cushion the landlord from damages caused by a pet in the case of eviction or refusal to pay damages. However, even 1% of rent extrapolated over an entire year is a significant cost in which damages can and are able to be repaired. Consider this a preferable alternative to either individuals being unable to obtain or keep adequate housing, or additional companion animals overcrowding shelters or being let out on the streets. Thank you.

Support
Joanne Therrien
for Myself
Dover

I urge you to pass HB 1553 so pet owners who rent have more affordable options for housing. Thank you.

Support
Kathleen Lord
for Myself
NORTHWOOD

Vote ITL because: ~This will be very harmful to pet owners by driving many more landlords to just simply not accept pets. ~Does not allow recouping for extra management troubles when there is a pet ~1% of rent is insignificant to the cost of pet damage and extra management. This is a total joke. ~540-D:4 II expecting bad acting tenants are actually going to pay for their damage is also a joke. ~No distinguishing between different types and sizes of pets that cause different amounts of damage. ~Multiple pets cause multiple damage and multiple extra management effort ~A pet is a choice, not a right ~540-D:3 would defeat benefits of HB1336 for marginally qualified tenants ~540-D:3 deposit limit is already covered in present law and not needed. ~Service and support animals are already protected. The 540-D:4 I provision is unnecessary

Oppose
Jon Kelly
for Myself
Concord

Kitties and puppies are cute. But they scratch floors. They pee. They shed. And sometimes they vomit and poop especially when they are sick. They do these things no matter how sweet, how adorable, or how well loved they are. Responsible landlords need to consider these expenses when they determine pet rent. (A pet security deposit is not allowed in NH.) They do not need an arbitrary and low-balled cap imposed by the legislature. If HB1553 passes, landlords will likely ban pets or calculate a rent that passes pet damage costs along to all tenants.

Oppose
Hannah Meiselman
for Myself
Machester

Excessive pet fees disproportionately affect renters and families. Reasonable limits help keep housing accessible while allowing responsible pet ownership.

Support
Janet Lucas
for Myself
Campton

Support
Roy Schweiker
for Myself
Concord

This limitation will cause more landlords to ban pets entirely

Oppose
Christopher Freeman
for Myself
Keene

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
CARA CABRAL
for Myself
MADBURY

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Alisa Clements
for Pet Advocacy Network
Washington

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Margaret Konze
for Myself
Pembroke

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Lydia Hawkes
for Myself
Goshen

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Stephanie Vazzano
for Myself
Concord

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Mary Brickley
for Myself
Chester

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
nancy burger
for Myself
Salem

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Helen Tam-Semmens
for Myself
Stoddard

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Kathy Peirce
for Myself
Auburn

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Cathy Craven
for Myself
Strafford

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Jean Slepian
for Myself
STODDARD

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Linda Dionne
for Myself
Raymond

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Spencer Sherman
for Myself
Manchester

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Lucille Thibodeau
for Myself
Nashua

Position recorded without written comment.

Support