HB1553
House · 2026 sessionDemocraticKilled in HouseLimits on pet fees and rent
AI-generatedLimits monthly pet rent to one percent of a rental unit's rent and prohibits nonrefundable pet fees, with certain exceptions.
relative to pet-related fees and rent in residential tenancies.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
52 submissionsAll 10 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · February 19, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
52 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lauren Martin for Myself Amherst Pet rent is an additional expense to owning a pet that has become extremely expensive. I have one cat, ONE. And I have to pay $55 a month to have him in my apartment. This is in addition to the $250 non-refundable pet deposit I paid upon moving in. I hope we can pass this bill to cap the rising cost of pet rent. | Amherst | Support | 313 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Jacqueline Calhoun for Myself Plymouth Please keep this in mind, as you consider HB 1553. I am confident this Bill is a good one and will benefit our pet-friendly housing community: "Being unable to find affordable, pet-friendly housing is one of the top reasons people surrender pets to shelters or offer them to strangers on Craigslist and similar platforms. Either way, this consequence can be devastating to the pet in question, whether given to a stranger (who could be a violent criminal) or surrendered to a shelter, where they could be killed." Please SUPPORT HB 1553. Thank you! | Plymouth | Support | 558 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Linda Rauter for Myself Chichester There is a serious shortage of affordable housing. Tacking on ridiculously high pet fees onto the rent leads to pet surrenders to shelters which are already stressed to care for pets surrendered because of rising costs of living.. Caps on fees or a 1% fee based on the rent may help people keep their beloved pets. | Chichester | Support | 315 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Anita Fernandez for Myself Manchester As someone who rented property with a companion animal and paid a monthly fee, I understand that animal companions cost money and that the monthly charge helps cushion the landlord from damages caused by a pet in the case of eviction or refusal to pay damages. However, even 1% of rent extrapolated over an entire year is a significant cost in which damages can and are able to be repaired. Consider this a preferable alternative to either individuals being unable to obtain or keep adequate housing, or additional companion animals overcrowding shelters or being let out on the streets. Thank you. | Manchester | Support | 598 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Joanne Therrien for Myself Dover I urge you to pass HB 1553 so pet owners who rent have more affordable options for housing. Thank you. | Dover | Support | 102 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Kathleen Lord for Myself NORTHWOOD Vote ITL because: ~This will be very harmful to pet owners by driving many more landlords to just simply not accept pets. ~Does not allow recouping for extra management troubles when there is a pet ~1% of rent is insignificant to the cost of pet damage and extra management. This is a total joke. ~540-D:4 II expecting bad acting tenants are actually going to pay for their damage is also a joke. ~No distinguishing between different types and sizes of pets that cause different amounts of damage. ~Multiple pets cause multiple damage and multiple extra management effort ~A pet is a choice, not a right ~540-D:3 would defeat benefits of HB1336 for marginally qualified tenants ~540-D:3 deposit limit is already covered in present law and not needed. ~Service and support animals are already protected. The 540-D:4 I provision is unnecessary | NORTHWOOD | Oppose | 853 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Jon Kelly for Myself Concord Kitties and puppies are cute. But they scratch floors. They pee. They shed. And sometimes they vomit and poop especially when they are sick. They do these things no matter how sweet, how adorable, or how well loved they are. Responsible landlords need to consider these expenses when they determine pet rent. (A pet security deposit is not allowed in NH.) They do not need an arbitrary and low-balled cap imposed by the legislature. If HB1553 passes, landlords will likely ban pets or calculate a rent that passes pet damage costs along to all tenants. | Concord | Oppose | 571 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Hannah Meiselman for Myself Machester Excessive pet fees disproportionately affect renters and families. Reasonable limits help keep housing accessible while allowing responsible pet ownership. | Machester | Support | 155 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Janet Lucas for Myself Campton
| Campton | Support | 2 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Roy Schweiker for Myself Concord This limitation will cause more landlords to ban pets entirely | Concord | Oppose | 64 | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Christopher Freeman for Myself Keene Position recorded without written comment. | Keene | Oppose | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
CARA CABRAL for Myself MADBURY Position recorded without written comment. | MADBURY | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Alisa Clements for Pet Advocacy Network Washington Position recorded without written comment. | Washington, DC | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Margaret Konze for Myself Pembroke Position recorded without written comment. | Pembroke | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Lydia Hawkes for Myself Goshen Position recorded without written comment. | Goshen | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Stephanie Vazzano for Myself Concord Position recorded without written comment. | Concord | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Mary Brickley for Myself Chester Position recorded without written comment. | Chester | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
nancy burger for Myself Salem Position recorded without written comment. | Salem | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Helen Tam-Semmens for Myself Stoddard Position recorded without written comment. | Stoddard | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Kathy Peirce for Myself Auburn Position recorded without written comment. | Auburn | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Cathy Craven for Myself Strafford Position recorded without written comment. | Strafford | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Jean Slepian for Myself STODDARD Position recorded without written comment. | STODDARD | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Linda Dionne for Myself Raymond Position recorded without written comment. | Raymond | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Spencer Sherman for Myself Manchester Position recorded without written comment. | Manchester | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 | |
Lucille Thibodeau for Myself Nashua Position recorded without written comment. | Nashua | Support | — | Jan 27, 2026 |