HB1423
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanDied in HouseImproper influence and kratom ban
AI-generatedExpands the offense of improper influence to include threats against immediate family members of public servants, party officials, or voters, sets mandatory minimum penalties, and makes synthetic and semisynthetic kratom illegal except for scientific research.
(New Title) relative to the offense of improper influence and making synthetic and semisynthetic kratom illegal to prepare, distribute, manufacture, sell, possess, or advertise, with exceptions made for scientific research.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
8 submissionsAll 4 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Died — the House and Senate did not agree · May 21, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- ✕House
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
8 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
georgina Lambert for Myself Belmont Testimony on HB 1423: Relative to the Offense of Improper Influence I strongly oppose HB 1423 due to its underpinnings that risk eroding public trust in our political and judicial systems. While the bill seeks to revise provisions regarding improper influence, it fails to adequately consider the potential for misuse by those in power. The lack of clear guidelines leaves room for arbitrary enforcement, which could disproportionately target individuals and communities based on subjective interpretations. This uncertainty poses a significant threat to the integrity of our democratic processes, as it may silence dissenting voices and limit political engagement. Furthermore, the bill lacks sufficient oversight and funding for effective implementation and enforcement. Without a dedicated framework to monitor and evaluate the implications of these changes, there is a high likelihood of prosecutorial overreach. The absence of safeguards increases the risk of weaponizing the law against individuals advocating for community interests, particularly among marginalized groups who may be more vulnerable to discriminatory practices. This legal ambiguity not only heightens the potential for injustice but also discourages active civic participation and transparency in our governance. Finally, implementing an inclusive intersectional framework is crucial for any legislation impacting public trust. HB 1423 must prioritize the voices of those most affected by issues of influence and power dynamics. Engaging diverse community stakeholders in the development of this bill will ensure that it does not inadvertently reinforce systemic inequalities. We must advocate for policies that uphold accountability without sacrificing the principles of justice and fairness. It is essential that we protect our democratic values by rejecting measures that threaten public integrity and civil rights. | Belmont | Oppose | 1,900 | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Kathleen Malsbenden for Myself Newmarket HB 1423 is unnecessary and harmful. Existing laws already address threats, and mandatory minimums undermine judicial judgment without improving safety. | Newmarket | Oppose | 151 | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Linda MacGuffie for Myself Laconia I oppose the death penalty. | Laconia | Oppose | 27 | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Jacqueline Hamilton for Myself Center Barnstead I do not support capital punishment. | Center Barnstead | Oppose | 36 | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Jennifer legier for Myself Campton Position recorded without written comment. | Campton | Oppose | — | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Claudia DeFuria for Myself Salem Position recorded without written comment. | Salem | Support | — | Jan 15, 2026 | |
Katie McLaughlin for Myself Weare Position recorded without written comment. | Weare | Oppose | — | Jan 15, 2026 | |
David Jenkins for Myself Jaffrey Position recorded without written comment. | Jaffrey | Oppose | — | Jan 15, 2026 |