HB1418
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanDied in HouseMinimum vote for town spending
AI-generatedSets a minimum affirmative vote threshold for new or expanded spending in SB 2 towns.
setting a minimum affirmative vote for new or expanded spending for SB 2 towns.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
79 submissionsAll 10 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Died on the table in the House · March 11, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
79 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tara Haarlander for Myself Manchester OPPOSE | Manchester | Oppose | 6 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Joan Cross for Myself Loudon This bill is an undemocratic attempt to stifle providing resources for our schools. | Loudon | Oppose | 83 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Rebecca Wilson for New Hampshire School Boards Association Concord NHSBA is opposed to this bill. Given the number of hearings and executive sessions scheduled at this time, we will be submitting further testimony after the hearing, as appropriate. Thank you. | Concord | Oppose | 196 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Jenna Hardy for Myself Merrimack This is unnecessary. NH believes in local control. Let's act like it. | Merrimack | Oppose | 69 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Russell Hodgkins for Myself Amherst This bill ensures that spending increases are supported by a wide swath of the voters. | Amherst | Support | 86 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Susan Raymond for Myself Tamworth This bill is just an undemocratic attempt to stop providing resources for our schools. | Tamworth | Oppose | 86 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Michelle O'Brien for Myself Bedford Testimony in Opposition to HB 1418 Good morning, Chairman and members of the committee. As a lifelong New Hampshire resident and educator who has dedicated my career to serving our students and communities, I rise today in strong opposition to HB 1418. This bill, which would impose a minimum affirmative vote threshold for new or expanded spending in SB 2 towns, fundamentally undermines the democratic principles that define New Hampshire's local governance. For generations, our state has trusted voters to make decisions through simple majority rule—the bedrock of representative democracy. HB 1418 would abandon this principle, requiring a supermajority for certain budget decisions while maintaining simple majority votes for everything else. This creates an unequal system that disproportionately restricts voters' ability to invest in their schools and communities. As an educator, I have witnessed firsthand the consequences of inadequate school resources. Every year, I watch my colleagues dig into their own pockets for classroom supplies. I see outdated textbooks, crumbling infrastructure, and overcrowded classrooms. I watch talented teachers leave the profession because salaries cannot keep pace with the cost of living. Our students deserve better, and our communities have the right to decide how much investment they want to make in education, without arbitrary barriers. This bill would make it significantly harder for communities to respond to genuine needs. If a school's roof is leaking, enrollment is growing and we need additional teachers, or we want to restore programs cut during difficult budget years, this legislation would require us to meet a higher bar than any other municipal decision. It treats investment in education as inherently suspect rather than as the foundation of our democracy and economy. Moreover, this is a solution in search of a problem. SB 2 communities already have robust safeguards: public budget hearings, deliberative sessions, transparent processes, and the fundamental right of voters to approve or reject spending proposals. If voters believe spending is excessive, they vote it down—as they have done countless times across our state. The system works. What HB 1418 really does is silence voters. By requiring supermajorities, it elevates the power of "no" votes over "yes" votes. A minority of voters could block investments that a majority of their neighbors support. This isn't protecting taxpayers—it's disenfranchising them. New Hampshire has always believed in local control and trusting citizens to make decisions for their own communities. This bill abandons that trust. It assumes voters cannot be responsible stewards of their own tax dollars and need the legislature to constrain their choices. I reject that premise entirely. I urge you to oppose HB 1418 and preserve the democratic rights of New Hampshire voters to fully participate in decisions about their schools and communities. Thank you for your time and consideration. | Bedford | Oppose | 3,025 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Angela Bird for Myself New Ipswich New Hampshire has a unique way to engage the public the many community issues. Politics has always been pushed by those wo are passionate about an issue. Others have always been left out if the do not take the time to participate. There is no reason to impose a minimum voter participation standard just for schools. If people care, and want their voice to be heard, they can always participate. Punishing schools because there are not enough people that care one way or another is not the way to represent a community. | New Ipswich | Oppose | 520 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Sara Matatall for Myself Goffstown Stop undermining local elections! We are a state that prides itself on local control, where have those ideals gone?? Enough with the attempts to make local governments adhere to your ideals, leave our town elections alone!! | Goffstown | Oppose | 223 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Lynn McRae for Myself Lyme Good morning, HB 1418 bill is an *undemocratic attempt* to stifle providing resources for our schools. It is based on *arbitrary participation thresholds* at town and school district meetings. It's like making a 'town quorum' be necessary in order to get business done, boards elected, budgets passed. Vote NO HB 1418. Thank you, Lynn McRae, RN, BS Ed. MALS Dartmouth Lyme | Lyme | Oppose | 391 | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Ian Howes for Myself Hudson Position recorded without written comment. | Hudson | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Leigh Hutchinson for Myself Derry Position recorded without written comment. | Derry | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Colleen Noonan for Myself Dover Position recorded without written comment. | Dover | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Gerard Desrochers for Myself Franklin Position recorded without written comment. | Franklin | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Tami Lanzillo Zeimetz for Myself Gilford Position recorded without written comment. | Gilford | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Georgina Lambert for Myself Belmont Position recorded without written comment. | Belmont | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Katie McLaughlin for Myself Weare Position recorded without written comment. | Weare | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Jessica Lee for Myself Londonderry Position recorded without written comment. | Londonderry | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Danielle Alley for Myself Dover Position recorded without written comment. | Dover | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Heather Wilcauskas for Myself Sanbornville Position recorded without written comment. | Sanbornville | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Laura Kostenblatt for Myself Jaffrey Position recorded without written comment. | Jaffrey | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Linda Christ for Myself Sandwich Position recorded without written comment. | Sandwich | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Zoe Martel for Myself Henniker Position recorded without written comment. | Henniker | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Emily Ellis for Myself Exeter Position recorded without written comment. | Exeter | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 | |
Susan Dunker for Myself Madbury Position recorded without written comment. | Madbury | Oppose | — | Feb 17, 2026 |