HB1399
House · 2026 sessionDemocraticDied in HouseClaremont school renovation funding
AI-generatedAppropriates funds to the Claremont school district for costs associated with the 2015 Stevens High School renovation project.
making an appropriation to the Claremont school district for costs associated with a building renovation project from the revenue stabilization reserve account.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
43 submissionsAll 10 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Committee recommended Inexpedient to Legislate; died at adjournment · March 4, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
43 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shirley Montgomery for Myself Hanover I think the Claremont school district needs this support. | Hanover | Support | 57 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Sharon Racusin for Myself Hanover I support this bill | Hanover | Support | 19 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Russell Hodgkins for Myself Amherst Given the corruption in the Claremont school district, this seems to be throwing good money after bad. | Amherst | Oppose | 102 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Nancy Miles for Myself Hanover I support this bill to reimburse Claremont for building renovation work. | Hanover | Support | 72 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
John Cloutier for Myself Claremont Mr. Chair & House Finance Committee Members, Unfortunately because of a conflict with my employment schedule as a security officer, I am unable to personally testify on HB 1399 today. But I am in strong support of this bill, which I understand would reimburse the Claremont School District at least somewhat for the renovation of Stevens High School, the public high school serving Claremont. Facing the loss of the high school's accreditation in 2013, Claremont voters approved a $12.6 renovation bond. A renovation bond for which they have had to pay since 2013 on their own, with no state building aid. Building aid that was discontinued a few years earlier by we in legislature due to the fiscal crisis brought on by the Great Recession of 2008 . Building aid that had given to many other school districts in the past. Because the Claremont School District has had to pay for the high school's renovation on its own, property taxes have increased resulting in Claremont having one of the highest property tax rates in our state. Such high property taxes overly burden many of my constituents who are not wealthy, & have discouraged some families & businesses from moving in to Claremont. In summary, this high tax burden is not helping Claremont to prosper not only now, but for the future. Therefore, for the sake of fairness, I urge you to give HB 1399 a unanimous OTP vote. Thank you. State Rep. John Cloutier, Claremont | Claremont | Support | 1,449 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
tom luther for Myself claremont Greetings from Sullivan County NO. Please do not give the school board "nonpartisan good progressives" another way to avoid accountability. We have a warrant article to sell it anyway. Buy it at auction and fix it yourself. No. | claremont | Oppose | 238 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Simon Berrio for Myself Dalton This is another clear attempt to reward Claremont voters for their negligence and apathy. Just a bailout bill by another name and on the backs of those of us who actually pay attention to what our school district is doing and then hold them accountable. Claremont voters did none of that and their situation is simply "Claremont broke it, Claremont buys it". | Dalton | Oppose | 360 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Alex de Geofroy for Myself Rochester HB 1399-FN addresses a critical failure of state policy that left the Claremont School District uniquely vulnerable. By renovating Stevens High School in 2015, Claremont fulfilled its obligation to provide a safe, accredited facility during a state-imposed building aid moratorium. This forced local property taxpayers to shoulder 100% of a cost that the state would otherwise have subsidized. In low-wealth districts, this "starve-the-beast" approach to infrastructure has proven unsustainable and has directly contributed to the current fiscal crisis. However, a direct $5 million appropriation must be accompanied by rigorous state oversight to ensure these funds lead to long-term stability rather than temporary relief. I support this appropriation only if it is contingent upon Claremont accepting a state-appointed financial monitor and adhering to a strict timeline for completing overdue audits. We must ensure that the students of Claremont do not suffer for the accounting failures of the past, but we must also ensure that state taxpayers are investing in a district that is being held to the highest standards of financial transparency and accountability moving forward. | Rochester | Support | 1,186 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Patricia Goodlin for Myself New London I support providing building aid funds for the Claremont School District. Please vote "yes" on this bill. | New London | Support | 106 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Timothy Finney for Myself Bridgewater This is unconstitutional, according to a recent press release from the Secretary of State. An error appears in Part II, Article 83, of the NH State Constitution where the word “or” was mistakenly replaced with “of” in many printed and online versions over the past several decades. That small change materially alters the meaning of a clause that limits how state tax dollars may be used. | Bridgewater | Oppose | 389 | Jan 26, 2026 | |
Charlene Lovett for Myself Claremont Position recorded without written comment. | Claremont | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Susan Shadford for Myself Hanover Position recorded without written comment. | Hanover | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Hannah Meiselman for Myself Manchester Position recorded without written comment. | Manchester | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Priscilla Benson for Myself Hanover Position recorded without written comment. | Hanover | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Margaret Bowles for Myself Hanover Position recorded without written comment. | Hanover | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Tami Lanzillo Zeimetz for Myself Gilford Position recorded without written comment. | Gilford | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Rosina Lis for Myself Stoddard Position recorded without written comment. | Stoddard | Oppose | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Timothy Lis for Myself Stoddard Position recorded without written comment. | Stoddard | Oppose | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
isabeth gross for Myself hanover Position recorded without written comment. | hanover | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Claudia Gibson for Myself Hanover Position recorded without written comment. | Hanover | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Mary Burton for Myself Hanover Position recorded without written comment. | Hanover | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Karen Chase for Myself Hanover Position recorded without written comment. | Hanover | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Timothy Finney for Myself Bridgewater Position recorded without written comment. | Bridgewater | Oppose | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Nanch Kelley for Myself Hanover Position recorded without written comment. | Hanover | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 | |
Mackenzie Presher for Myself Londonderry Position recorded without written comment. | Londonderry | Support | — | Feb 2, 2026 |