HB1388
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawOne amendment per constitutional ballot question
AI-generatedLimits the ballot form for proposed constitutional amendments to one amendment per question.
relative to the form of ballot for amendments to the constitution.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
7 submissionsAll 3 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Signed into law · June 9, 2026- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
The record · every submission as filed
7 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARA CABRAL for Myself MADBURY I appreciate the goal of clarity in this bill. However, I oppose it as written because it does not include requirements for plain language or accessibility. If ballots are expanded without corresponding accessibility safeguards, this may unintentionally create barriers for some voters. | MADBURY | Oppose | 286 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Karen Burnett-Kurie for Myself Wolfeboro It shows a hearing on HB1742 but it is not in the draw down menu so I am voting against 1742 here. | Wolfeboro | Oppose | 99 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Hannah Meiselman for Myself Manchester I support HB 1388 because each constitutional amendment deserves a clear, separate question on the ballot. Ensuring that voters never cast a single vote on multiple amendments protects transparency, prevents confusion, and upholds the integrity of New Hampshire’s constitutional amendment process | Manchester | Support | 296 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Tami Lanzillo Zeimetz for Myself Gilford Position recorded without written comment. | Gilford | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Stephanie Vazzano for Myself Concord Position recorded without written comment. | Concord | Support | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Daniel Richardson for Myself Nashua Position recorded without written comment. | Nashua | Support | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Margaret Konze for Myself Pembroke Position recorded without written comment. | Pembroke | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 |