HB1050
House · 2026 sessionRepublicanInterim studyHomeschooling zoning override rights
AI-generatedEstablishes a right to provide educational instruction to children in any designated or non-designated municipal zone, overriding zoning ordinances or land use regulations that would otherwise restrict such instruction.
establishing the right to provide educational instruction in municipally zoned and non-zoned areas.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
146 submissionsAll 15 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Referred to interim study (House) · March 11, 2026- ✓Introduced
- House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
146 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alex de Geofroy for Myself Rochester HB 1050 is a reckless overreach that fundamentally undermines the ability of New Hampshire’s cities and towns to manage their own neighborhoods. While I support diverse educational options, this bill is not about education; it is about the wholesale destruction of local zoning authority and the "Home Rule" principles that New Hampshire has traditionally cherished. Zoning ordinances exist for a reason: they manage traffic flow, ensure public safety, and protect the character and property values of our residential neighborhoods. By allowing "Learning Pods" to operate in any zone without restriction, the state is stripping local planning boards and neighbors of their right to ensure that new uses of property are safe and compatible with the surrounding community. Forcing a neighborhood to accept an unregulated educational facility with no recourse for noise, parking, or safety concerns creates a "wild west" environment that puts both students and communities at risk. We should encourage educational innovation within the established, democratic framework of local planning, not by granting a blanket exemption that silences the voices of local residents. | Rochester | Oppose | 1,166 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Marie Nardino for Myself Andover Libraries should be controlled by the people and not by the government--to preserve critical thinking and avoid authoritarianism. | Andover | Oppose | 129 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Karen Burnett-Kurie for Myself Wolfeboro It shows a hearing on HB1742 but it is not in the draw down menu so I am voting against 1742 here. | Wolfeboro | Oppose | 99 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Stephanie Vazzano for Myself Concord This issue needs to be left to the communities, not unilaterally decided by the State of New Hampshire. | Concord | Oppose | 103 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Donna Tully for Myself Littleton This is for the sake of all NH voters. | Littleton | Oppose | 38 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
KELLI BROWN for Myself BROOKLINE There shouldn't be a special carve out for learning pods. Any group that is educational in nature should be subject to the same safety and zoning standards as other schools, daycare, and learning institutions. Local communities should be afforded their local control so they can do what is best for their community. | BROOKLINE | Oppose | 317 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Catharine Farkas for Myself Sanbornton Absolutely NOT!!!! This is an absurd and dangerous bill. Zoning rules and regulations are there to help protect us from shoddy building practices, especially for our children. | Sanbornton | Oppose | 175 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Hannah Meiselman for Myself Manchester I oppose HB 1050 because overriding local zoning to allow unregulated educational operations anywhere undermines municipal planning and weakens public-school systems. Communities deserve the ability to manage land use responsibly and ensure that educational facilities meet safety and accountability standards | Manchester | Oppose | 309 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Jane Walsh for Myself New London Under this vague description, there are no limits on the number of children attending, the size or height of the building, the number of parking spaces required, any other uses of the space, etc. on these so called "Learning Pods" It’s just one more effort to give special privileges to unlicensed, pop-up alternatives (including for profits) to public education. | New London | Oppose | 369 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Karen Chase for Myself Hanover Just one more bill in the on-going attempt to tear down public education. Vote no on this bill. | Hanover | Oppose | 96 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Maureen Redmond-Scura for Myself Concord If my tax dollars are going to be used for education, I want a say in what's taught, who is taught and how it's taught. I want accountability and transparency. This does NONE of that. | Concord | Oppose | 187 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Nancy Miles for Myself Hanover I oppose this bill. Pop-up, non-public schools need to follow established zoning laws for that area | Hanover | Oppose | 99 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
James Hiltz for Myself Pembroke This bill would make zoning restrictions inapplicable to “learning pods”. Learning pods are defined as “providing educational instruction to voluntarily associated children.” Under this vague description, there are no limits on the number of children attending, the size or height of the building, the number of parking spaces required, any other uses of the space, etc. It’s just one more effort to give special privileges to unlicensed, pop-up alternatives (including for profits) to public education. | Pembroke | Oppose | 503 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
tom st.martin for Myself concord No building standards; no class environment standards; no enrollment standards; no location safety standards ; no pass. | concord | Oppose | 123 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
tom luther for Myself claremont Greetings from Sullivan County: Learn anywhere, learn everywhere. | claremont | Support | 68 | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Denise Clark for Myself Milford Position recorded without written comment. | Milford | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Lois Cote for Myself Manchester Position recorded without written comment. | Manchester | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Deborah Klein Walker for Myself Meredith Position recorded without written comment. | Meredith | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
CARA CABRAL for Myself MADBURY Position recorded without written comment. | MADBURY | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Regan Lamphier for Myself Nashua Position recorded without written comment. | Nashua | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
sandra Blanchard for Myself Loudon Position recorded without written comment. | Loudon | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Megan Hughes for Myself Walpole Position recorded without written comment. | Walpole | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Beth Edwards for Myself Lisbon Position recorded without written comment. | Lisbon | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Carol Lavoie for Myself North Conway Position recorded without written comment. | North Conway | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 | |
Lorraine Hansen for Myself Rollinsford Position recorded without written comment. | Rollinsford | Oppose | — | Feb 10, 2026 |