Citizen in a RepublicNH House Testimony

HB710

House · 2025 sessionRepublicanDied in conference

Utility ownership of advanced nuclear resources

AI-generated

Authorizes electric utilities to own, operate, and offer advanced nuclear resources, sets limits on distributed generation investment, clarifies energy coordinator duties, and allows multi-year power purchase RFPs coordinated with other New England states.

(New Title) enabling electric utilities to own, operate, and offer advanced nuclear resources, and relative to purchased power agreements for electric distribution utilities and limitations on community customer generators.Official record

Energy and UtilitiesState GovernmentAI-generated

Division of testimonyComputed by this site

22 submissions

All 5 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.

Status

Died — conference committee did not agree · June 19, 2025
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Conference
  5. Governor
  6. Law
Sponsors, hearings & roll-call votes

The record · every submission as filed

22 submissions
Expand
Jaroslav Hutar
for Myself
Durham

Respectfully, the Seabrook tomb is a weighty legacy. No new SMR should be considered in NH legislation until the existing reactor is decommissioned and all the 40 years of storage casks with hot radioactive fuel are removed from the last nuclear reactor site in New England. There is no waste free fusion technology for grid use in the Department of Energy plans. However, today the NRC deems that operating an outdated 80 year old reactor in 2050 will be safe. It is not! Evacuation chaos during the false alarm, continuously crumbling degraded concrete, and the recent quake should be enough warning for this committee.

Oppose
Stephanie Davis
for Myself
Greenville

I am against cloud seeding and weather manipulation. Please pass this bill for cleaner air, water and better soil for my farm.

Support
Briane Pinkson
for Myself
Cornish

We still have no known way to safely store nuclear waste. It seems a very crazy way to produce energy when there are so many safety risks involved with nuclear power. What is the plan for all the nuclear waste we currently have produced? and you want to produce even more? Nuclear power, even the "new and improved" has no place in the state of NH and should not be considered a reasonable, or safe "alternative" energy source.

Oppose
Janet Lucas
for Myself
Campton

I am opposed to this bill as it is a threat to New Hampshire’s economy and future prosperity. More nuclear plants are closing than being constructed because of the availability of cheaper sources of energy. The greatest dilemma left to communities who hosted nuclear power plants is what to do with the nuclear waste. US taxpayers pay billions of dollars to private companies to store spent nuclear fuel . The Maine Yankee power plant in Wiscasset, ME remains open to store used fuel even though it hasn’t produced any energy for decades as the cost to maintain and update the plant became prohibitively expensive. Storage sites age out after 20 years further increasing costs. Wiscasset is trying to reach a new tax agreement based on Maine Yankee’s new status as a storage facility. This has of course ended up in the courts with no resolution likely for many years. There’s no question that Wiscasset had an initial windfall in tax revenues when the plant was operational and fully staffed. However, a storage facility does not employ nearly as many workers so that revenue source is gone, leaving Wiscasset a $94 Million white elephant that is not paying taxes. Do not bring this problem to the Granite State. Common sense requires opposition to this bill.

Oppose
Gordon Springate
for Myself
Wilton

I like many things of this bill, especially advancing nuclear, but this issue of renewables, and any designation thereof now negates some of the benefits of HCR2. In 3 III where the language is “ . . . 3 or 8 percent . . .” is limiting. The government should not be picking winners and losers and the market should decide. I realize this is not related to the change. But NH should get of the business of financially supporting or restricting one energy source over another. There is a word for this. Begins with C.

Neutral
Nick Krakoff
for Conservation Law Foundation
Concord

Position recorded without written comment.

Neutral
Tiffany Hall
for Myself
Rochester

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Marc Brown
for Consumer Energy Alliance
Newfields

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Samantha Beauchemin
for Myself
Manchester

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Oliver Matte
for Myself
North Sutton

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Greg Moore
for American for Prosperity
Bedford

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Doug Bogen
for Seacoast Anti-Pollution League
Barrington

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Senator Howard Pearl
for Myself
Loudon

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Carol Foss
for NH Audubon
Concord

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Theresa Swanick
for Myself
Effingham

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Nancy Wightman
for Myself
Cornish

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Judith Kaufman
for Myself
Cornish

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Daniel Richardson
for Myself
Nashua

Position recorded without written comment.

Support
Patricia Anastasia
for Myself
Londonderry

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Evan Oxenham
for Myself
Plainfield

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Krystal Bloom
for Myself
Francestown

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose
Patricia Piscetta
for Myself
Belmont

Position recorded without written comment.

Oppose