HB600
House · 2025 sessionDemocraticKilled in HouseRanked-choice voting for towns
AI-generatedEstablishes procedures for ranked-choice voting, including ballot design, counting methods, and voter instructions, that municipalities may choose to adopt for their elections.
enabling ranked-choice voting for municipal elections.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
738 submissionsAll 192 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 26, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
Argument digest
AI-generatedfrom 192 of 192 written submissionsHB600 would let New Hampshire municipalities opt in to ranked-choice voting (RCV) for local elections without mandating it statewide. The large majority of submitters support the bill, arguing RCV produces majority-backed winners, reduces vote-splitting and the spoiler effect, lessens polarization, and preserves local control since towns must affirmatively opt in. A smaller group opposes the bill, raising concerns about vote-counting complexity, auditability, administrative burden on clerks, and departure from traditional plurality voting.
- Ensures winners have genuine majority supportSupport29 of 192 reviewed
Supporters argue RCV prevents candidates from winning with only a plurality in multi-candidate races, ensuring the eventual winner is backed by a true majority of voters.
“Under the current plurality voting system, candidates can be elected without securing a majority of the votes, especially in races with multiple contenders. This can result in officials who do not represent the choice of most voters.”
— Justin Manteuffel, Rochester · #481240 — read full submission →
“RCV is fully constitutional and may save money for some municipalities by preventing the need for a separate runoff election.”
— Joan Hamblet, PORTSMOUTH · #483451 — read full submission →
- Eliminates spoiler effect and vote-splittingSupport54 of 192 reviewed
Many submitters argue RCV lets voters rank their true first choice, including third-party or independent candidates, without fear of "wasting" their vote or inadvertently helping elect their least-preferred candidate.
“Ranked choice voting is a really good tool for voters, and allows them to support third party candidates without "wasting" or "throwing away" their vote.”
— Amy Agostino, Londonderry · #486526 — read full submission →
“I felt like my vote mattered more with ranked choice voting because I could vote for the candidate I wanted without "throwing away" my vote.”
— Molly Hearn, Dover · #484358 — read full submission →
- Reduces polarization and negative campaigningSupport40 of 192 reviewed
Submitters contend RCV incentivizes candidates to appeal broadly for second- and third-choice votes, discouraging negative campaigning and easing partisan polarization and two-party dominance.
“let's take a first step toward reducing the bitter partisanship promoted or enabled by "first past the post"/"winner take all" voting systems.”
— Reinmar Seidler, Cornish Flat · #482907 — read full submission →
“Rank Choice Voting is the most important step we can take in ending partisan gridlock and restoring confidence in our government.”
— Nancy Brown, Hopkinton · #483851 — read full submission →
- Preserves local control as an opt-in enabling billSupport31 of 192 reviewed
Supporters emphasize that HB600 does not mandate RCV anywhere; it only allows municipalities to opt in through their own local procedures if they choose, consistent with local control.
“HB 600 is only an enabling bill that in itself does not establish ranked choice voting, but only enables municipalities (for local municipal elections) to take the steps necessary to opt-in, if they so choose.”
— Sharon Racusin, Hanover · #483543 — read full submission →
“This is just enabling legislation, each community can decide whether or not to opt in.”
— Roger Clum, Portsmouth · #481437 — read full submission →
- General enthusiasm for the bill's fairness and voter choiceSupport62 of 192 reviewed
A large number of brief submissions express general support for RCV as fairer, more representative, and giving voters more of a voice, without elaborating a specific mechanism.
- Ranked-choice voting has worked well in other statesSupport15 of 192 reviewed
Some submitters point to positive experiences with RCV in Maine and other jurisdictions as evidence it can work well in New Hampshire.
“It has been in place and widely supported in Maine and other places around the country, and demonstrated it's practicality and efficacy.”
— Paul Pindris, Deerfield · #485628 — read full submission →
“I teach in Maine, where ranked-choice voting has been successfully implemented. I support the idea of offering it as an option here in New Hampshire.”
— Kelly Warner, Exeter · #482837 — read full submission →
- Would increase voter participation and turnoutSupport13 of 192 reviewed
Some submitters argue RCV would re-engage voters who currently stay home because they feel unrepresented by the two major parties, boosting overall turnout.
“Ranked Choice Voting would reach out to this population and give them a reason to return to the voting booth.”
— Susan Raymond, Tamworth · #482033 — read full submission →
“Ranked choice voting will encourage greater participation in the elective process, and will help ensure that NH's elected officials more closely represent the views of NH citizens.”
— Ken Dunnington, Dover · #481406 — read full submission →
- Could reduce costs by eliminating separate runoffsSupport8 of 192 reviewed
A smaller number of submitters note RCV could save municipalities money and time by avoiding the need for separate runoff elections in races without a majority winner.
“This legislation would allow New Hampshire municipalities to choose whether to implement Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in their local elections through warrant articles or other legal procedures.”
— Steven Brown, Dover · #481520 — read full submission →
“It will also save time and money for those towns, such as Manchester, that already use Runoff elections.”
— Marta Northcutt, Bedford · #481442 — read full submission →
- General opposition to ranked-choice votingOppose6 of 192 reviewed
A number of submitters state opposition to RCV without detailed elaboration, sometimes citing problems seen in other states.
“I am absolutely against the disease of ranked-choice voting. We've seen how it's caused serious issues in other states that have adopted it, such as Alaskan Republicans trying to recall or control the anti-Republican behavior of Senator Murkowski, but being unable to do so.”
— Robert Kenney, Strafford · #481190 — read full submission →
“I do not support ranked choice voting”
— Jamie Carreau, Derry · #484154 — read full submission →
- RCV is too complex and confusingOppose4 of 192 reviewed
Opponents argue ranked-choice voting adds unnecessary complexity to elections, undermining the goal of a voting process that is simple, quick, and easily understood.
“This is a virtually incomprehensible voting methodology that adds complexity, additional tabulation steps and potential for error”
— Ray Chadwick, Bedford · #484289 — read full submission →
“Strongly Oppose. Elections should be simple, quick, and the results instantly understandable”
— Hugh Scott MacDonald, Amherst · #483402 — read full submission →
- Vote tabulation and auditing concernsOppose2 of 192 reviewed
Opponents question who would tabulate ranked-choice ballots and how results could be audited or recounted, viewing this as a significant unresolved challenge.
- Problems experienced in other jurisdictionsOppose2 of 192 reviewed
Some opponents cite reports of RCV causing lengthy delays in declaring winners, such as in New York City elections, as evidence against adopting it.
- Departs from one-person, one-vote principleOppose1 of 192 reviewed
One opponent argues RCV undermines the traditional one-person, one-vote principle by effectively disenfranchising voters whose candidates are eliminated in later rounds.
- Administrative burden on municipal clerksOppose1 of 192 reviewed
One opponent, describing municipal work experience, argues implementing RCV would place an undue administrative burden on city and town clerks and prefers keeping the traditional most-votes-wins standard.
- Existing election law should be simplified firstOppose1 of 192 reviewed
One submitter argues New Hampshire's election law is already overly complex and should be simplified before adding a new voting method like RCV.
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
The record · every submission as filed
738 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mason Bliss for Myself Peterborough, NH There is almost nothing we need in this nation more than ranked choice voting. Ranked choice voting rewards candidates whose platforms appeal to and best serve the public. Ranked choice voting removes the "vote out of fear" factor and lets us choose the candidate we most want. Ranked choice voting is not a partisan measure - it works for everyone equally, and it will make us a better nation. We need it up and down the ballot. Let's start with it here. | Peterborough, NH | Support | 456 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Leane Garland for Myself Hanover Rank-choice voting allows for more subtlety in the election of leadership positions. Instead of win/lose, with the losers feeling unrepresented and resentful, rank-choice voting allows people to feel that their vote counted, even if their candidate does not "win". Vote Ought to Pass. | Hanover | Support | 286 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Elven Ealy for Myself Litchfield ranked-choice voting will reduce extremists chances of winning and therefore will reduce partisanship in general. In general the cooler more thoughtful heads should prevail. This will help clarity and has improved things in places where it has been adopted. | Litchfield | Support | 258 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
mollie allen for Myself Exeter I say yes to this bill allowing rank choice in municipal elections in New Hampshire. | Exeter | Support | 84 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Micheline Hagan for Myself Barrington Please vote to support ranked-choice voting. | Barrington | Support | 44 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Amy Agostino for Myself Londonderry Ranked choice voting is a really good tool for voters, and allows them to support third party candidates without "wasting" or "throwing away" their vote. It has worked well in Maine (and other places I couldn't name at the moment) And although opponents claim it is confusing, we use ranked choice all the time, without naming it as such: "When you go to the store, I would like chocolate chip ice cream. If they don't have that, I'd like coffee. If they don't have either of those, then vanilla is okay" I'm excited to see a RCV bill - please support it! | Londonderry | Support | 561 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Lorna Carlisle for Myself Salisbury I think ranked-choice voting would benefit the public and also elect less extremist candidates on both ends of the spectrum | Salisbury | Support | 123 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Holly Cooper for Myself Concord If there are more than 2 candidates for the same office, and especially if there are many candidates, without ranked choice voting we can wind up with a candidate who does not have majority support. | Concord | Support | 198 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Margaret Konze for Myself Pembroke I support this bill for all the reasons already mentioned, but specifically because it will reduce some of the toxic tribalism in politics. We shouldn’t be treating politics like a Super Bowl where you bet on the team you think is most likely to win, you should be able to choose the person who best represents you and the hopes you have for the society that you live in, and to also choose a 2nd choice, and 3rd, etc. Ranked Choice Voting makes everyone’s votes count, and this bill isn’t even mandating anything. Please pass this bill. | Pembroke | Support | 542 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Jana Sellarole for Myself Walpole Get rid of gerrymandering! It's un-American, and anti-democratic! | Walpole | Support | 66 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Brandy Hardiman for Myself HAMPTON I am supportive of Ranked Choice Voting as it will mean better choices, better campaigns, and better representation. Thank you. | HAMPTON | Support | 128 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Sue Nastasi for Myself Dover I and many others support this bill, HB600. It should be passed by an unanimous vote for New Hampshire's local elections. The bill details are very sensible. For anyone not familiar with ranked choice voting please read the details of https://www.nhrankedchoice.org/ . The bill is needed for fairness especially to be sure every single vote counts, the voters' voice was heard. As a quote from the above website "allowing you to vote your preference, not just who you think might win". Please support HB600 for the local New Hampshire elections. Every single level of government affects Granite Staters, from very local to presidential. | Dover | Support | 648 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Heidi Hamer for Myself MANCHESTER No thank you !! ITL this bill in committee | MANCHESTER | Oppose | 44 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Gary Hamer for Myself MANCHESTER No thank you! | MANCHESTER | Oppose | 15 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Michelle Saint Lorraine for Myself Concord I am in support of ranked choice voting. The two-party system is so corrupted, it must go. With ranked choice voting, it is less likely that a dictator wannabe and his boy Friday will be able to get into office and take control of our government. I strongly support this bill. | Concord | Support | 277 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Erika MacDonald for Myself Hollis Please help fix this broken election system by allowing voters to rank their choice of candidates. This two party system we're currently using is part of the reason our society is so fractured. It requires all elections to be "us against them". Ranked choice voting allows for voters to vote for the person, not the party. | Hollis | Support | 322 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Paul Pindris for Myself Deerfield I believe ranked-choice voting provides assurance to all voters that winners of an election represent the broadest support among the electorate. It has been in place and widely supported in Maine and other places around the country, and demonstrated it's practicality and efficacy. I support this bill and strongly encourage all NH representatives to do so as well. | Deerfield | Support | 365 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Elizabeth Ropp for Myself Manchester Dear House Election Law committee, Please support Rank Choice Voting for the State of New Hampshire. We are a purple state. Many people like to chose candidates more than they want to affiliate to a party. This bill will help support New Hampshire's Live Free or Die spirit. It will make our elections more interesting and it will allow more comraderies among the candidates and the voters. Sincerely, The Honorable Elizabeth Ropp | Manchester | Support | 440 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Stephen Dow for Myself Somersworth I want to see ranked choice voting in NH since it provides a better means of casting and counting votes in which voters rank candidates in order of choice and counting proceeds in rounds pursuant to RSA 659:105, III to determine which candidate has a plurality of votes for an election | Somersworth | Support | 285 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Carla Folkert for Myself Keene Please let our votes count | Keene | Support | 27 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Janis Smith for Myself Portsmouth I approve | Portsmouth | Support | 9 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Susanne Veal for Myself Rochester I support HB600 because I believe ranked choice voting is the best way for voters to elect a candidate who has garnered a majority of the vote. I believe NH cities and towns should be permitted to choose the option of ranked choice voting in their election process. | Rochester | Support | 265 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Joanna Andros for Myself Walpole I support this bill which allows ranked choice in municipal elections but does not require them. | Walpole | Support | 97 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Linda Bundy for Myself Antrim This bill gives towns and party caucuses the option to choose ranked choice voting at the municipal and party level. Ranked choice voting gives voters a broader choice of candidates and results in the election of candidates that are supported by a larger portion of voters. Using ranked choice voting at these levels can demonstrate to voters and candidates the benefits of this system. Please vote OTP on HB 600. | Antrim | Support | 413 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Linzee Coleman-Bagge for Myself Exeter For the common good. | Exeter | Support | 20 | Feb 25, 2025 |