HB574
House · 2025 sessionRepublicanKilled in HouseBackground checks for voting machine vendors
AI-generatedRequires background checks of employees, contractors, directors, and partners of private companies that program and maintain the state's electronic ballot counting machines and allows public inspection of related records.
requiring background checks of the private companies and their contractors who program and maintain New Hampshire voting machines.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
139 submissionsAll 26 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 26, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- Governor
- Law
The record · every submission as filed
139 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mollie allen for Myself Exeter I believe it’s essential that voting machine contractors have background checks. | Exeter | Support | 80 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Barbara Callaway for Myself Hanover This is an effort to bridge partisan divides and further assure the public of the security of elections in NH. | Hanover | Support | 111 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Sue Nastasi for Myself Dover I support HB574 because it as the bill states: This bill requires background checks of employees, contractors, directors, and partners of private companies that program and maintain the electronic ballot counting machines in the state. This bill also allows the public inspection of such records. That should be done already! It is believed that such background checks are done and now we need a law to be sure it is done. | Dover | Support | 427 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Marilyn Wilking for Myself Walpole This requirement is BASIC. Of course, we want anyone who has anything to do with the integrity of elections to have a criminal background check. I am incredulous that this basic safety precaution is not already required. Thank you for getting this done. | Walpole | Support | 257 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Joanna Andros for Myself Walpole This bill makes sense, since there needs to be some degree of oversight of a private company to ensure the safety and integrity of elections. | Walpole | Support | 143 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Sharon Racusin for Myself Hanover This bill requires background checks of employees, contractors, directors, and partners of private companies that program and maintain the electronic ballot counting machines in the state. This bill also allows the public inspection of such records. | Hanover | Support | 250 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Doug Wilson for Myself Greenland Dear House Election Law Committee: I support background checks for voting machine personnel. New Hampshire often plays a pivotal role in determining the outcome of national elections. By requiring background checks for voting machine personnel it reduces the potential for election fraud, by screening out applicants with known criminal records. Sincerely, Doug Wilson Greenland, NH 603 502 9234 | Greenland | Support | 402 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
James Goodwin for Myself Brentwood There needs to be background checks for all voting machine personnel. This is one small step closer to restoring our elections in Nh. | Brentwood | Support | 133 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Shirley Montgomery for Myself Hanover I think this bill would help to ensure that qualified people work with voting machines . | Hanover | Support | 88 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Leane Garland for Myself Hanover I appreciate the efforts of the Legislature to ensure the voting process is safe and secure. Background checks of all those that maintain and program the electronic ballot counting machines makes perfect sense. Thank you for voting Ought to Pass on this bill. | Hanover | Support | 261 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Peter Coffin for Myself Kingston This bill will help ensure the integrity of, and maintain voter confidence in, our election processes. | Kingston | Support | 102 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Patricia Waterman for Myself Merrimack None | Merrimack | Support | 4 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Raymond Waterman for Myself Merrimack None | Merrimack | Support | 4 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Carol Knieriem for Myself Concord Background checks on companies dealing with voting machines are importantly to make sure they are not hacked. | Concord | Support | 109 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Peggy Sheets for Myself Hollis Background checks on individuals overseeing the function of NH Voting machines is a good idea but too costly. | Hollis | Oppose | 109 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Bonnie Bruno for Myself Hollis I don't believe that this bill is necessary because of Any election interference based on the big lie. But I do think that background checks for private companies running voting machines is agreeable. My understanding is the price check is going to make it improbable most likely | Hollis | Support | 279 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Susan Smith for Myself Dover I support this bill because it would require background checks of the private companies and their contractors who program and maintain New Hampshire voting machines. | Dover | Support | 165 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Janet Lucas for Myself Campton Unnecessary legislation and expense | Campton | Oppose | 35 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Mary Davies for Myself Concord Public tax money is for public schools | Concord | Support | 38 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Nancy Sheridan for Myself Tamworth I support background checks of the private companies and their contractors who program and maintain New Hampshire voting machines | Tamworth | Support | 129 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Heather Pike for Myself Tamworth Background checks and identification are both reasonable security measures to introduce. However, this bill also requires that a list of election workers' full legal names be made available to the public. In an era where harassment and intimidation of election workers has risen (https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/local-election-officials-survey-may-2024), this may expose employees to avoidable harm. A public list of names is not needed to prevent misconduct, and any issues that arise should be handled in a way that doesn't invite the potential targeting or intimidation of election workers by malevolent actors. Workers can be held accountable for keeping elections secure without being put at risk of abuse. If the requirement of a public list of names was removed, I would support this bill. | Tamworth | Oppose | 823 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Cora QUISUMBING-KING for Myself Dover Please support HB574. This bill would assure the public of the safety of NH elections by requiring background checks of the private companies and their contractors who program and maintain New Hampshire voting machines. Thank you. | Dover | Support | 235 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Virginia Daschbach for Myself Exeter This bill will further support transparent and fair elections | Exeter | Support | 61 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Douglas Carmel for Myself Exeter It is beyond me to assume why the State wouldn't want to do background checks on private companies and their contractors who program and maintain New Hampshire voting machines. Do the background checks unless you're more interested in generating a fraud on the public! Common sense needs to be common. Background checks on private companies doing business with the State should be a given and a no-brainer. | Exeter | Support | 409 | Mar 4, 2025 | |
Gordon Springate for Myself Wilton I prefer ew eliminate the voting machines and hand count ballots | Wilton | Support | 64 | Mar 4, 2025 |