Citizen in a RepublicNH House Testimony

HB50

House · 2025 sessionDemocraticKilled in Senate

Suing over teaching discrimination violations

AI-generated

Allows a person aggrieved by an intentional or knowing violation of the state's prohibition on teaching discrimination to bring civil action against the school, and deems such violations by an educator a code-of-conduct violation.

(New Title) relative to intentional or knowing violation of the prohibition on teaching discrimination.Official record

DiscriminationEducation - GeneralCivil ActionsAI-generated

Division of testimonyComputed by this site

1,188 submissions

All 235 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.

Status

Killed in the Senate — Inexpedient to Legislate · May 15, 2025
  1. Introduced
  2. House
  3. Senate
  4. Governor
  5. Law
Sponsors, hearings & roll-call votes

Argument digest

AI-generatedfrom 235 of 235 written submissions

HB50 concerns New Hampshire's 'divisive concepts' law restricting how discrimination-related topics are taught in public schools and workplaces. A non-germane amendment was introduced mid-session that would keep the restriction in place and add civil/criminal penalties for violations, reversing the original bill's intent to repeal it. Supporters generally argue for honest, complete history education and protection for teachers from censorship or punishment, while opponents overwhelmingly object to the amendment as an improper reversal of a bill they say should simply repeal an already-unconstitutional law; a smaller number of opponents instead argue the bill removes anti-discrimination protections or that discrimination should not be taught in schools at all.

Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 20, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.

The record · every submission as filed

1,188 submissions
Expand
Amy Agostino
for Myself
Londonderry

We support the original bill, which would repeal the law that prohibited teachers from teaching “banned concepts”. But now extremist Republicans are trying to amend the bill to make it do the opposite. Under the amendment, they would keep the banned concepts law in place and add penalties for any school or educator who knowingly violates it.

Oppose
Terry Carter
for Myself
Dover

The Republican party has stooped low when they attach a ridiculous amendment to unrelated legislation in hopes that no one notices. Gosh, don't our elected leaders have more important things to work on, like border security or national infrastructure?

Oppose
Karen Rosenberg
for Disability Rights Center - NH
Concord

I am writing to voice the Disability Rights Center-NH's opposition to the Non-germane amendment to HB 50.

Oppose
Alice Bobroff
for Myself
Manchester

Good, common sense bill. I am in support.

Support
Angela Manugian
for Myself
Manchester

/

Support
Michael Castellucci
for Myself
Merrimack

The teachings of anything other than standard Math, English Science and social studies should not be taught by any school employee.

Oppose
Brian Trant
for Myself
Merrimack

The teachings of discrimination in a school setting should not be allowed by any school employee. depending on where personal views lay could cause a negative effect on students.

Oppose
Tiffney Castellucci
for Myself
Merrimack

Teachers need to stick to teaching Math, English, Science and Social Studies. The teaching of discrimination has no place in the public education system or workplace. Children should not be taught discrimination by a teacher because that teacher's personal bias may stray from historical factual data.

Oppose
Christopher Cutler
for Myself
Durham

I'm writing to oppose amendment 2025-0595h to this bill offered by Rep. Cordelli inasmuch as it reverses the purpose of the bill. I support the bill as originally written, repealing the current Divisive Concepts law.

Oppose
Deanna Wilson
for Myself
Rindge

I support the bill itself but do not support the Non-germane amendment. I am opposed to any & all amendments proposed in a legislative body that is considered not relevant or related to the main subject matter of the bill it is being attached to. This practice should not be allowed for ANY bills. If removed from this bill I would support the bill. Thank you, Deanna Wilson

Oppose
Alecia Magnifico
for Myself
Durham

My testimony is specifically directed at the non-germane amendment offered by Rep. Cordelli. I oppose this amendment, because it effectively reverses the meaning of the bill and attempts to put the divisive concepts law back into place in a similarly problematic form. This law threatened teacher speech and chilled the teaching of texts that address the experiences of groups who have been marginalized and discriminated against. This law harmed educators and curricula, and was found to be unconstitutionally vague for good reason. I oppose this amendment, as well as other bills or amendments that seek to restore it.

Oppose
Sandra Bothmer
for Myself
Brookline

I oppose the change to this bill, which was found unenforceable, that would add penalties ofr any school or educator who knowlingly violates the oeiginal bill. (The law is currently unenforceable because it was found by a court to be unconstitutional, but the sponsors of this amendment are apparently hoping the court decision will be overturned.)

Oppose
Debrah Howes
for American Federation of Teachers - NH
Bow

The law itself is unconstitutionally vague and needs to be overturned, as the US DIstrict Court has found. The nongermane amendmendment does not make it constitutional.

Oppose
Lorraine Wenger
for Myself
Amherst

I oppose this bill.

Oppose
Kimberly Bleier
for Myself
CONCORD

This does not fix the problem that the Banned Concepts law is unconstitutional. The only fix is to repeal the entire thing.

Oppose
David Taylor
for Myself
Plainfield

All students must be exposed to fact-based education.

Oppose
Susan Taylor
for Myself
Plainfield

We want truth and facts to be taught in our public schools and for all granite staters to feel welcome.

Oppose
Julie Laracy
for Myself
Conway

The original bill was good by protecting teachers. This amendment will do the opposite!! Please do not support this amendment to the original bill!

Oppose
Sharon Racusin
for Myself
Hanover

This is

Oppose
Giana Gelsey
for Myself
Madbury

This is an unethical work around to try to undo the repeal the law that prohibited teachers from teaching “banned concepts”. We don’t want the opposite; banned concepts is trying to enforce bigotry and ahistorical behavior and was already judged unconstitutional and unenforceable.

Oppose
Barbara Callaway
for Myself
Hanover

The original bill is better without the amendment. It provides that no education law of this state shall be construed to bar any school employee from teaching the historical or current experiences of any group that is protected from discrimination.

Oppose
Megan Davis
for Myself
Dover

I oppose this bill.

Oppose
Mollie Allen
for Myself
Exeter

pass the bill. This bill doesn’t not need the amendment.

Support
Melinda Stucker
for Myself
Hanover

Here's a "no-brainer" - This MUST be OPPOSED!!!!!!!!

Oppose
Heather Fritchy
for Myself
DERRY

It's incredibly important we don't brush discrimination under the rug. We need to remember how people have suffered from discrimination in the past and how people are still suffering from it today.

Support