HB440
House · 2025 sessionRepublicanSigned into lawEducator licensing exam requirements
AI-generatedRequires the department of education to adopt rules requiring candidates for initial administrator, teacher, instructional specialist, or educational specialist licenses to obtain passing scores on prescribed professional assessments.
relative to educator licensing.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
7 submissionsAll 2 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Signed into law · June 6, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✓House
- ✓Senate
- ✓Governor
- ✓Law
The record · every submission as filed
7 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daniel Richardson for Myself Nashua Another innovation in education reform. Requirements are adjusted to the specialized skills need. | Nashua | Support | 97 | Jan 22, 2025 | |
Kathleen Malsbenden for Myself Newmarket I oppose this bill because it unfairly singles out public school educators while completely excluding private school teachers, homeschooling parents, learning pod supervisors, and online instructors who have no certification from the same scrutiny. These individuals also have significant influence over the learning and well-being of children, yet they are not held to the rigorous certification standards required of public school teachers. This double standard leaves children vulnerable to questionable instructional practices and subpar instruction from under qualified individuals in non-public settings. Public school educators already meet extensive certification requirements set by the Board of Education, far surpassing what is expected of the groups this bill conveniently exempts. By targeting public school teachers alone, this bill perpetuates discrimination against a profession that has been thoroughly vetted and held to the highest standards. This legislation appears to serve no purpose other than to deepen divisions and advance the ongoing bias against public schools and their educators, a bias openly expressed by many of this bill's sponsors. It is not about improving education—it’s about undermining public schools and the dedicated professionals who work within them and who have taken under and graduate studies in their area of expertise, far more than the group you are conveniently excluding. . I urge you to reject this bill and instead focus on holding all people who work as “educators” to the same high standards, regardless of the setting in which they teach. | Newmarket | Oppose | 1,602 | Jan 22, 2025 | |
Sue Jaggard for Myself NewLondon Position recorded without written comment. | NewLondon | Oppose | — | Jan 22, 2025 | |
meghan OBrien for Myself Nottingham Position recorded without written comment. | Nottingham | Oppose | — | Jan 22, 2025 | |
Mary Leighton for Myself Dover Position recorded without written comment. | Dover | Oppose | — | Jan 22, 2025 | |
Eric Pauer for Myself Brookline Position recorded without written comment. | Brookline | Support | — | Jan 22, 2025 | |
Debra Merrick for Myself Atkinson Position recorded without written comment. | Atkinson | Oppose | — | Jan 22, 2025 |