CACR2
House · 2025 sessionDemocraticKilled in HouseBan on partisan redistricting
AI-generatedProhibits any legislative redistricting plan or district boundary from being drawn to favor or disfavor a political party or candidate and bars use of voter party affiliation or incumbent residency data in drawing districts.
relating to the drawing of district boundaries. Providing that no district boundaries shall be drawn in a way that favors or disfavors any political party or candidate.Official record
Division of testimonyComputed by this site
472 submissionsAll 91 written submissions were individually written — no organized campaign detected.
Status
Killed in the House — Inexpedient to Legislate · March 26, 2025- ✓Introduced
- ✕House
- Senate
- On the ballot
Argument digest
AI-generatedfrom 91 of 91 written submissionsCACR2 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would bar drawing New Hampshire legislative district boundaries in a way that favors or disfavors any political party or candidate. Nearly all submitters support the measure as a remedy to partisan gerrymandering and a way to restore public trust in elections, often citing recently vetoed district maps as evidence of the problem, while a small number of opponents argue it would improperly shift redistricting authority from the elected legislature to the courts.
- Bans partisan gerrymandering of district boundariesSupport40 of 91 reviewed
The core and most common argument is that district boundaries should never be drawn to favor or disfavor a political party or candidate, and that CACR2 would end gerrymandering by enshrining that principle in the constitution.
“Providing that no district boundaries shall be drawn in a way that favors or disfavors any political party or candidate. I support fair maps!”
— Vani Thilagar, Hollis · #485460 — read full submission →
“I support this bill which provides that no district boundaries shall be drawn in a way that favors or disfavors any political party or candidate.”
— Gail McPeek, Enfield · #483721 — read full submission →
“YES - no district boundaries shall be drawn in a way that favors or disfavors any political party or candidate!”
— Marlise Bryant, Hollis · #483297 — read full submission →
- Restores public trust in elections and democracySupport15 of 91 reviewed
Supporters argue that partisan gerrymandering has eroded confidence in the fairness of New Hampshire's electoral system, and that a constitutional ban on it would help restore trust in democratic institutions.
“The pernicious effects of gerrymandering in NH by Republicans are appalling. The results reverberate for years, leaving communities without effective and fair representation and resources.”
— Christine Bane, Strafford · #484032 — read full submission →
“As the vice president of the League of Women Voters NH familiar with the critical importance of impartial district boundaries, I support this bill.”
— janet ward, Contoocook, NH 03229 · #485650 — read full submission →
- Cites NH's recent history of gerrymandering as evidence of the needSupport6 of 91 reviewed
Several supporters point to specific examples, including maps vetoed by the Governor and locally gerrymandered wards, as concrete evidence that the current process has produced unfair districts.
“There is a history in NH of bad faith election voting boundary drawing. Governor Sununu saw fit to veto two maps drawn by Republican majority led legislatures in 2022 and 2024.”
— Susan Raymond, Tamworth · #481918 — read full submission →
“As someone who lives in a gerrymandered area of Dover I am all for anything that will result in non-partisan redistricting. Ward 4 has the prerequisite number of voters”
— Patricia Whitney, Dover · #483556 — read full submission →
“Per the December 2022 report of the NH Special Committee on Voter Confidence, “Partisan Process for Drawing Election Districts Has Undermined Confidence.”
— Jeffrey Smith, Epping · #483492 — read full submission →
- Ensures every vote counts equallySupport5 of 91 reviewed
Supporters argue that non-partisan redistricting is necessary so that each person's vote carries equal weight, framing this as a matter of basic democratic fairness.
“We need fair maps that ensure that each person’s vote really matters. Voters should choose their politicians, not politicians their voters.”
— Mary Meyers, Hancock · #482309 — read full submission →
“Our district lines should be chosen in a way that makes sure, to the extent possible, that every vote counts equally. It's what's fair and right”
— Mary Wilke, CONCORD · #486441 — read full submission →
- Preserves existing town and ward boundariesSupport1 of 91 reviewed
One supporter notes the bill also protects the existing boundaries of towns, wards, and unincorporated places, which is framed as strengthening local representation.
- Would improperly shift redistricting authority to the courtsOppose1 of 91 reviewed
An opponent argues that any legislative apportionment will inevitably reflect the makeup of the elected legislature to some degree, and that banning this would make unelected courts the arbiter of whether a map is sufficiently non-partisan, undermining the legislature's constitutional authority.
- Concern about effects on independent/undeclared votersOppose2 of 91 reviewed
A couple of submissions raise concern that the bill or related changes could affect independent and undeclared voters' ability to participate in primary elections, a group they note makes up a large share of NH's electorate.
“This bill would prevent "independent" voters from participating in primary elections. That would eliminate the 40% of NH votes who are independents!”
— Barbara Callaway, Hanover · #486421 — read full submission →
“The biggest Bloc of Voters in NH is Undeclared. The biggest bloc being excluded from the primaries is ridiculous.”
— Joshua Custer, Milton Mills · #481741 — read full submission →
Generated by claude-sonnet-5 (claude code agent) on Jul 22, 2026. Quotes are verbatim excerpts, verified against the cited submission before publication. Summaries are AI interpretation of the record, not part of it.
The record · every submission as filed
472 submissions| Expand | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leane Garland for Myself Hanover It is time the Legislature addressed the problem of gerrymandering! When redistricting, boundaries should be drawn in a non-partisan way as possible. No party should be favored by the simple act of defining voter districts. Support this bill. | Hanover | Support | 245 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Elven Ealy for Myself Litchfield It seems obvious that we would want something that is fair, impartial and will cut down on the ill will and chaos. We are living in a time where there is a fight or violence for almost everything. This is actually caused by people taking unfair advantage and those that are cheated wanting payback. I hope that we will start to move in a more peaceful direction. | Litchfield | Support | 362 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Patricia Martin for Myself Rindge This would negatively impact consumers and small businesses. I strongly oppose this bill. | Rindge | Support | 90 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Theodore Capron for Myself New Hampton We need to keep gerrymandering out of school district decisions | New Hampton | Support | 63 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Mary Downes for Myself Madbuy New Hampshire's House and Senate should reflect the diversity of political thought of the voters of New Hampshire, which leads to better laws and oversight. Please support CACR2 that would require that district boundaries be drawn in a way that does not favor any political party or candidate. | Madbuy | Support | 294 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Amy Agostino for Myself Londonderry Political gerrymandering is a problem in many other states; I support this bill to make district boundaries politically neutral. | Londonderry | Support | 128 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Mary Wilke for Myself CONCORD Our district lines should be chosen in a way that makes sure, to the extent possible, that every vote counts equally. It's what's fair and right; there is no decent argument to be made for gerrymandering. | CONCORD | Support | 205 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Barbara Callaway for Myself Hanover This bill would prevent "independent" voters from participating in primary elections. That would eliminate the 40% of NH votes who are independents! | Hanover | Support | 149 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Jillian Carey for Myself Hudson Stop gerrymandering our districts and let voters decide! | Hudson | Support | 56 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Linda mattlage for Myself Concord PLEASE stop the gerrymandering! | Concord | Support | 31 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Marilyn Learner for Myself Hollis Gerrymandering is disgusting ! | Hollis | Support | 30 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Shirley Montgomery for Myself Hanover I support this bill because I think it would prevent drawing boundaries to favor certain groups. It would help to make elections more fair. | Hanover | Support | 140 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Amy Burt for Myself Hudson Let's make the voting more fair. Gerrymandering is not a fair way to collect votes and is a way to suppress a true "winner" of an election. | Hudson | Support | 140 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Julie Levesque for Myself Hollis No district boundaries should be drawn in a way that favors or disfavors any political party or candidate. I support fair maps! | Hollis | Support | 128 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Pamela Noble for Myself Meredith I support the drawing of district boundaries as long as the boundaries drawn do not favor or disfavor any political party or candidate. | Meredith | Support | 137 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Sue Nastasi for Myself Dover Partisan gerrymandering must be made illegal. Democrats and Republicans must understand the need to be fair. The old description of "it's always done by both sides " should not exist. With CACR2 passing it will finally be a step in the correct direction. Packing registered voters of either Democrats or Republicans in districts that have predictable outcomes is wrong. Make New Hampshire proud. Pass this needed amendment. | Dover | Support | 434 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
janet ward for Myself Contoocook, NH 03229 As the vice president of the League of Women Voters NH familiar with the critical importance of impartial district boundaries, I support this bill. Please vote in favor of CACR2 | Contoocook, NH 03229 | Support | 177 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Ellen Moore for Myself Danville Gerrymandering is voter suppression. Don't allow people to rig the system. | Danville | Support | 75 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Andrea Seddon for Myself Hollis I am in support of making things more fair. Thank you | Hollis | Support | 53 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Vani Thilagar for Myself Hollis Providing that no district boundaries shall be drawn in a way that favors or disfavors any political party or candidate. I support fair maps! | Hollis | Support | 142 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Christine Ford for Myself Pelham I am opposed to slanting voting districts to favor a political party. Why would signing like this be legal? | Pelham | Oppose | 108 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Patricia Anastasia for Myself Londonderry I support making partisan redistricting illegal. The only fair redistricting is done by independent non-partisan redistricting committees and is necessitated by changes in population, not changes in politics. Non partisan redistricting benefits everyone. Partisan redistricting erodes trust in our elections and ends up in long, costly, and unnecessary court battles. Every state, but especially the Live Free or Die state, should outlaw partisan redistricting. | Londonderry | Support | 462 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Courtney Wason for Myself Derry Hello, I am writing in support of this anti-gerrymandering bill, to keep elections fair and equitable. I should HOPE that ALL elected officials would be in favor of such legislation. | Derry | Support | 182 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Peggy Sheets for Myself Hollis For any elected official who believes their responsibility as a public servant, elected by NH citizens, is to serve the greater good of the people of NH, this legislation should be a no-brainer. Elected officials truly interested in providing popular policies and platforms that will make NH voters want them to serve do not need to "rig the system" by districting/re-districting in favor of their own party. Passing this legislation will help ensure that elected officials work in the interest of the electorate; not in the interest of "their party." | Hollis | Support | 552 | Feb 25, 2025 | |
Linda Bundy for Myself Antrim Testimony in Support of CACR 2 February 25, 2025 9:00 am House Election Law Committee Legislative Office Building Room 306-8 Concord, NH 03301 Chairman Berry and Members of the House Election Law Committee, I support CACR 2, relating to the drawing of district boundaries. The New Hampshire Constitution tasks the House of Representatives with making an apportionment of representatives, thereby creating voting districts after each federal census. However, it does not specifically address the redistricting process. The result has been boundaries that created districts that heavily favor one party over another. Our New Hampshire Executive Council and State Senate maps are the most egregious examples of this partisanship. By prohibiting district boundaries from being drawn in a way that favors or disfavors any political party or candidate, CACR 2 establishes a process that values fairness over political maneuvering. Disallowing the use of partisan data in the creation of districts sets a clear accountability standard. Neither party should be able to give themselves an advantage, and CACR 2 addresses this issue. Fair maps will ensure that each person’s vote matters. I ask that you vote Ought to Pass on CACR 2. Respectfully, Linda Bundy Antrim | Antrim | Support | 1,286 | Feb 25, 2025 |